PDA

View Full Version : Saving Michael Vick's Dogs


sedan
07-07-2008, 06:43 PM
Saving Michael Vick's Dogs
Pit Bulls Rescued From the Football Player's Fighting Ring Show Progress in an Unprecedented Rehabilitation Effort

By Brigid Schulte
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, July 7, 2008; Page A01

When football superstar Michael Vick pleaded guilty last year to conspiring to run a dogfighting operation, we knew he had kept about 50 pit bulls on his 15-acre property in rural Surry County, Va., on a road named Moonlight. We knew the dogs were chained to car axles near wooden hovels for shelter. And we knew the dogs that didn't fight were beaten, shot, hanged, electrocuted or drowned.

But we didn't know their names. Headlines described the nameless dogs as "menacing." Some animal rights groups called for the "ticking time bombs" to be euthanized as soon as Vick's case was closed and they were no longer valuable as evidence. That's what typically happens after a dogfighting bust.

Instead, the court gave Vick's dogs a second chance. U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson ordered each dog to be evaluated individually, not judged by the stereotype of the breed. And he ordered Vick to pony up close to $1 million to pay for the lifelong care of those that could be saved.

Of the 49 pit bulls animal behavior experts evaluated in the fall, only one was deemed too vicious to warrant saving and was euthanized. (Another was euthanized because it was sick and in pain.)

More than a year after being confiscated from Vick's property, Leo, a tan, muscular pit bull, dons a colorful clown collar and visits cancer patients as a certified therapy dog in California. Hector, who bears deep scars on his chest and legs, recently was adopted and is about to start training for national flying disc competitions in Minnesota. Teddles takes orders from a 2-year-old. Gracie is a couch potato in Richmond who lives with cats and sleeps with four other dogs.

Of the 47 surviving dogs, 25 were placed directly in foster homes, and a handful have been or are being adopted. Twenty-two were deemed potentially aggressive toward other dogs and were sent to an animal sanctuary in Utah. Some, after intensive retraining, are expected to move on to foster care and eventual adoption.

How can this be? Reports of gruesome pit bull maulings make international news. Pit bulls are one of the few canine breeds thought to be so dangerous that they are banned in some places.

The answer, says Frank McMillan, a veterinarian who is studying the recovery of some of the Vick dogs, is that we don't know. "We've assumed all pits are the same, and we've never let this many fighting dogs live long enough to find out. There are hardly ever studies, because these animals don't survive," he said.

Classic fighting pit bulls, part bulldog and part terrier, were bred to be friendly to people and aggressive with other dogs. Their ability to withstand great pain and keep fighting is a quality prized as "gameness."

But with an explosion in urban street fighting, some pit bulls are being trained to go after animals and people. Evaluators said that when they walked into the kennels where the Vick dogs were being held in the fall, they weren't sure what to expect.

"I thought, if we see four or five dogs that we can save, I'll be happy," said Randy Lockwood, an animal behaviorist with the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. "If we had to euthanize the majority, then we could at least say we'd tried."

Instead, they found dogs with behaviors that ran the gamut. Some would lick human hands but lunge at other dogs. Some almost immediately went into play mode with other dogs, wagging their tails and crouching down on their front legs in a play bow. "Some actually perked up and developed more confidence only around other dogs," said Rebecca Huss, a law professor and animal law expert who was appointed by the court to oversee the evaluations and determine the dogs' fates. "They actually seemed happier around other dogs."

Rest of article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/06/AR2008070602351.html?hpid=artslot).

DarkFantasy96
07-07-2008, 07:26 PM
I'm so happy about this! I love animals and I would hate to think that these dogs were damaged beyond rehabilitation. :)

sedan
07-07-2008, 07:58 PM
I'm so happy about this! I love animals and I would hate to think that these dogs were damaged beyond rehabilitation. :)As soon as I saw the article I knew I had to post it.

It's a day brightener. :)

rendova
07-08-2008, 08:33 AM
I would like to think that the dogs are savable and could make potential good , amendable animals.
Unfortuantely, I cannot.

From this website:

http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/statistics.html



The deadliest dogs
Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, has conducted an unusually detailed study of dog bites from 1982 to the present. (Clifton, Dog attack deaths and maimings, U.S. & Canada, September 1982 to November 13, 2006; click here to read it.) The Clifton study show the number of serious canine-inflicted injuries by breed. The author's observations about the breeds and generally how to deal with the dangerous dog problem are enlightening.

According to the Clifton study, pit bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks that were included in the study, 68% of the attacks upon children, 82% of the attacks upon adults, 65% of the deaths, and 68% of the maimings. In more than two-thirds of the cases included in the study, the life-threatening or fatal attack was apparently the first known dangerous behavior by the animal in question.

In the year 2007, there were 32 FATALITIES from dog maulings in the United States alone.

These people are wasting their time. Both their time and their money would be better served elsewhere.

OldPhart
07-08-2008, 08:37 AM
These people are wasting their time. Both their time and their money would be better served elsewhere.

I agree.

es347fan
07-08-2008, 08:12 PM
And today, the new poster boy for the SPCA (http://www.ajc.com/wireless/content/sports/falcons/stories/2008/07/08/vick_0709.html) filed bankruptcy from prison.

let1959
07-10-2008, 02:38 PM
I'm so happy to hear that most of these dogs were saved and are now undergoing rehabilitation, etc. While reading this story and the descriptions of behavior these precious dogs displayed was one of being frightened. The loud noises, one looking for escape routes just in case and so on told me these dogs didn't want to participate in the sick events and knew what they were to do once that cage door was opened or the light that meant something sinister. My heart goes out to these dogs and hope each and every one of them lives a life in peace and with love.Dogs of any breed should be spoiled rotten and loved on...not forced to kill or mame. As for Vick....he can kiss my @$$ and I believe he should remain in prison for a very long time. And I'm so broken up that he's had to file bankruptcy...lol Po' baby!

mikezila
07-10-2008, 05:34 PM
I would like to think that the dogs are savable and could make potential good , amendable animals.
Unfortuantely, I cannot.

From this website:

http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/statistics.html



The deadliest dogs
Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, has conducted an unusually detailed study of dog bites from 1982 to the present. (Clifton, Dog attack deaths and maimings, U.S. & Canada, September 1982 to November 13, 2006; click here to read it.) The Clifton study show the number of serious canine-inflicted injuries by breed. The author's observations about the breeds and generally how to deal with the dangerous dog problem are enlightening.

According to the Clifton study, pit bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks that were included in the study, 68% of the attacks upon children, 82% of the attacks upon adults, 65% of the deaths, and 68% of the maimings. In more than two-thirds of the cases included in the study, the life-threatening or fatal attack was apparently the first known dangerous behavior by the animal in question.

In the year 2007, there were 32 FATALITIES from dog maulings in the United States alone.

These people are wasting their time. Both their time and their money would be better served elsewhere.
does that study adjust for the massive numbers of pitbulls and their mixes out there? i thought not. even if you sleep in a locked room with a pork chop tied around your neck with a hungry dog, you're still more likely to be killed hitting an animal on the road.

http://www.deercrash.com/states/national_data.htm

rendova
07-11-2008, 12:05 PM
does that study adjust for the massive numbers of pitbulls and their mixes out there? i thought not. even if you sleep in a locked room with a pork chop tied around your neck with a hungry dog, you're still more likely to be killed hitting an animal on the road.

http://www.deercrash.com/states/national_data.htm

The study indicates that pit bulls, Presarios, and their mixes, were taken into consideration.

Perhaps your scenario about the pork chop and the huingry dog is correct up to a point, but even one person killed by a dog is one too many.

mikezila
07-11-2008, 12:59 PM
The study indicates that pit bulls, Presarios, and their mixes, were taken into consideration.

Perhaps your scenario about the pork chop and the huingry dog is correct up to a point, but even one person killed by a dog is one too many.
one is one too many, but you're still more likely to win the lottery than be killed by a dog.