View Full Version : " And so,
Foolsworth
08-31-2008, 01:29 PM
my fellow Americans : ask not what your country can do for
you -- ask what you can do for your country. "
-- J.F.K. { Inaugural address,Jan.10,1961 }
However,isn't that the inversion of what The Bama boy preaches.
Because Democrats are in Love with Ideals.Ideals that cost
money.In other words Tax & Spend.
Even Catholic boy J.F.K wood definately have to take Bama boy
out behind the woodshed and teach a few tings.
Foolsworth
08-31-2008, 01:52 PM
Because Liberals LOVE theatre.Like how Hillary ends her little
Spiel referencing Harriet Tugman.What the hell was that all about.
Hillary Lives,like most Democrats in a Fantasy World.THEY are the ones
Mirred in the past.Love to act like they wanna move forward and
then constantly bring up stuff from the past.
Hillary was trying to plead for Woman's role in moving forward.
Women have won that role.Literally.Show me a woman who
is being Oppressed.You can't.Making her The First President won't
change a Goddamned thing.It's just Theatre.India has a Female.
Pakistan did { Bhuto }.
Men commit more suicide.Men are now surpassed by females
in college attendance.
The Japanese/Orientals lead good lives in America and have
LITERALLY No Authority in representation { Political office }.
This Leftist Hillary drivel where all she has to do is trot out
some Harriet Tugman struggle,and the Sheep go crazy.
The only time Sheep go Nuts is when a Huge Big Bad Wolf
glitters it's gangs.Or the sound of sheers.
I wonder if Hillary is scaredy of her Hairdresser.
I wonder if Harriet Tugman,woulda been scaredy of a Hillary.
I think History will be.
paulc
08-31-2008, 01:53 PM
''Democrats are in love with ideals,ideals that cost money''.
Exactly how much has been spent on Iraq so far ?
Foolsworth
08-31-2008, 02:01 PM
''Democrats are in love with ideals,ideals that cost money''.
Exactly how much has been spent on Iraq so far ?
History will show how unraveling a madman in the hub of oil
rich Middle east,and setting up a Democratically voted on society
may well transcend that region from one of constant flux,maddening
brutality { Saddam & Sadist Sons murdering 30,ooo civilians per
year on average} and Instabilty into one of increasing good fortune.
BTW ... Bush called for a use of force Vote.Even Biden voted
for.Ever notice how the only time Democrats talk about Veterans is
when a casuality is announced.What about when hero's are
mentioned.Many,many,many hero's involved in Iraqi Freedom.
Just like why would a Military Man or Family consider a Democrat.
Democrats are in favor of Soldiers as Victim/Casuality Not Hero's.
Love making Military cuts.
Travh20
08-31-2008, 02:04 PM
''Democrats are in love with ideals,ideals that cost money''.
Exactly how much has been spent on Iraq so far ?
SO since we spent a butt load of money on Iraq we should give Obama a blanck checkbook? Why do liberals always have to justify every bad idea they had with bad Iideas Bush had? A bad idea is a bad idea.
paulc
08-31-2008, 02:04 PM
I can only hope that history records that Bush failed in his promise to eliminate AQ, and instead abused his position of power to use the
United States Armed Forces to carry out his own personal agenda,
which had nothing to do with US National Security.
Its a pity that there is no one in America with the balls to impeach him for doing so.
paulc
08-31-2008, 02:07 PM
SO since we spent a butt load of money on Iraq we should give Obama a blanck checkbook? Why do liberals always have to justify every bad idea they had with bad Iideas Bush had? A bad idea is a bad idea.
Thats not what Im saying.
If McCain looses the election, part of the blame can lie at Bush's door.
NOBODY wants another four years of that shit.
Thats why its important to give McCains opponent [no matter whom it is]
a chance to steer America in a new direction, and start cleaning up the mess the current Adminstration has put America and the World in.
Foolsworth
08-31-2008, 02:48 PM
I can only hope that history records that Bush failed in his promise to eliminate AQ, and instead abused his position of power to use the
United States Armed Forces to carry out his own personal agenda,
which had nothing to do with US National Security.
Its a pity that there is no one in America with the balls to impeach him for doing so.
What Impeachable offense.?
He stated his case for Iraq in his State of the Union.
Colin Powell used the most updated Intel,which even British
Intelligence still stands by to address The United Nations.
Bush called for and got a Use of Force vote.
Name for me just ONE Senator who didn't voice exactly the same
sentiment about Saddam as a possible Threat as Bush did.
And I'll Drudge up that Senstor and find they actually did Voice
the same dislike and warnings about Saddam,at some point.
Just coincidentially Pre-Invasion.
paulc
08-31-2008, 02:57 PM
What Impeachable offense.?
He stated his case for Iraq in his State of the Union.
Colin Powell used the most updated Intel,which even British
Intelligence still stands by to address The United Nations.
Bush called for and got a Use of Force vote.
Name for me just ONE Senator who didn't voice exactly the same
sentiment about Saddam as a possible Threat as Bush did.
And I'll Drudge up that Senstor and find they actually did Voice
the same dislike and warnings about Saddam,at some point.
Just coincidentially Pre-Invasion.
Right, so you also are playing the 'evidence' card.
When a person is presented with 'evidence' from a supposedly high grade sourse, obviously your gonna take for what it is.
The White House was wrong.
Dowing Street was wrong.
Colin Powell made sure Tenet kept quite regards NEW evidence that Iraq had NO WMDs, so the invasion could continue anyway.
All this effort to invade Iraq, its a fucken pity so little effort was put into eradicating AQ at Tora Bora, the man and his Administartion should be ashamed of themselves.